• As a new login system we use the Wacken.ID. To link your current account in the Wacken Forum with the Wacken.ID, please click on the link and enter your e-mail address, which you also use in the forum. A user with your username and email address will be created automatically. You will then receive an email and will need to confirm your Wacken.ID.

    If you have any problems, please send us an email.

    Click here to migrate your account to a Wacken.ID.

agresionpower

W:O:A Metalgod
Jun 22, 2005
79,374
584
160
38
Almere, Holland
I tend to "no".
The treaty in itself isn't needed as such. It's just a hollow phrase.
However, NOT voting is an automatic "yes"! So... not much of a choice here. (the minimum participation grade, if not met, no referendum, thus "yes")

so you're going to vote in favour of the xenophobes?
 

Quark

Der Beste
Jul 19, 2004
107,444
7,523
170
Best, Nederland. Jetzt Belgien
But just doing this, means you're supporting the treaty as it is! Only because of the participation limit!
I'd prefer to use my vote for a bad choice rather than not to use it for the cause of 1 or 2 multimiliardairs.

And it took me a long time, to reflect the issue, before I registered myself as a voter. But I solomly believe in the Swiss referendum system.
 

Zachia

W:O:A Metalmaster
May 8, 2012
28,412
335
118
Thatˋs me right now...sooo tired.
katzenbaby-schlaeft-in-hand.jpg
 

agresionpower

W:O:A Metalgod
Jun 22, 2005
79,374
584
160
38
Almere, Holland
But just doing this, means you're supporting the treaty as it is! Only because of the participation limit!
I'd prefer to use my vote for a bad choice rather than not to use it for the cause of 1 or 2 multimiliardairs.

with a no vote you do exactly the same, but for 2 other multimiliardairs.

if the no vote wins the xenofobic powers in holland will cry victory, and that won't be good at all!